DOLAR
33,9620
EURO
37,7013
ALTIN
2.820,25
BIST
9.685,49
Adana Adıyaman Afyon Ağrı Aksaray Amasya Ankara Antalya Ardahan Artvin Aydın Balıkesir Bartın Batman Bayburt Bilecik Bingöl Bitlis Bolu Burdur Bursa Çanakkale Çankırı Çorum Denizli Diyarbakır Düzce Edirne Elazığ Erzincan Erzurum Eskişehir Gaziantep Giresun Gümüşhane Hakkari Hatay Iğdır Isparta İstanbul İzmir K.Maraş Karabük Karaman Kars Kastamonu Kayseri Kırıkkale Kırklareli Kırşehir Kilis Kocaeli Konya Kütahya Malatya Manisa Mardin Mersin Muğla Muş Nevşehir Niğde Ordu Osmaniye Rize Sakarya Samsun Siirt Sinop Sivas Şanlıurfa Şırnak Tekirdağ Tokat Trabzon Tunceli Uşak Van Yalova Yozgat Zonguldak
İstanbul
Hafif Yağmurlu
25°C
İstanbul
25°C
Hafif Yağmurlu
Salı Hafif Yağmurlu
25°C
Çarşamba Az Bulutlu
24°C
Perşembe Yağmurlu
24°C
Cuma Az Bulutlu
24°C

FTX Hearing in US Senate Reveals Congress Doesn’t Have Immediate Answers

As the crypto industry’s epic disaster continues to unfold with a criminal case and regulatory actions, U.S. senators didn’t find any clear path in a Wednesday hearing.

FTX Hearing in US Senate Reveals Congress Doesn’t Have Immediate Answers
14.12.2022 23:06
A+
A-

The crypto industry is calling for U.S. regulations as the epic failures of FTX drag at the sector and most regulators say they can’t do the job without more powers from Congress. So far, a sound-and-fury campaign from lawmakers hasn’t yet signified a path forward.

The path will almost certainly depend on Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, who concluded an FTX hearing Wednesday with a pointed question:

“Do you think crypto platforms could mostly comply with actual regulations?” he asked of witness Hilary Allen, a professor at American University’s law school who is a critic of the digital assets industry.

“No, I don’t,” she said. “And I think when they’re calling for regulator clarity, what they’re asking for actually is bespoke regulation that they can comply with.”

“Good answer,” he said.

Brown and other lawmakers in the hearing settled into the lanes the parties have established in the wake of FTX: Condemnation and suspicion of cryptocurrencies from Democrats, and an insistence from Republicans that the technology is innocent. But the hearing did little to signal what they might do about the industry next year, when crypto legislation is expected to really get rolling.

The chairman hinted that one priority may be in going after the structure of the big crypto firms, which routinely combine exchange, lending, custody and investing functions all under the same roof in ways that would be outlawed in the more closely regulated U.S. financial industry.

“If we are going to learn from FTX’s meltdown, we must look closely at the risks from conflicts at crypto platforms that combine multiple functions,” he said. “We can look to existing banking and securities laws for time-tested approaches.”

FTX and the trading firm also founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, Alameda Research, intermingled their funds and accounts, according to the criminal charges and the findings of its bankruptcy CEO.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is still leading the way in crypto oversight via enforcement actions, and it added some against FTX and Bankman-Fried on Tuesday, accusing them of defrauding investors. SEC Chair Gary Gensler has insisted that his agency is fine moving ahead with the powers it already has to force digital assets companies to comply with securities regulations, and he’s warned the industry that the standoff between his agency and crypto firms is nearing its end.

But Sen. Brown and other top regulators, such as Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, have argued that the answer has to be a wider effort across the federal government. Such a legislative solution would likely involve debates in several committees next year and may take months to make significant progress.

Any action from the Democrat-controlled Senate will also have to mesh with the views of a Republican-controlled House of Representatives over the next two years. While the industry has enjoyed a period of some bipartisan sentiment, the drama around FTX may have widened the rift a bit, with committee members such as Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) questioning whether establishing regulations would give the industry too much credibility.

The committee had initially meant to have Bankman-Fried testify, but he’d refused the invitation even before being arrested this week. They also didn’t have replacement CEO John Ray III, who appeared Tuesday in the House. Instead, the witness list included Kevin O’Leary, a former spokesman for FTX who said crypto’s problems could be solved with regulation; Jennifer Schulp from the libertarian Cato Institute; and Ben McKenzie Schenkkan, a television actor who has written about crypto.

A number of Republican senators were no-shows at the FTX hearing, and the crypto views of Sen. Tim Scott, (R-S.C.), who is set to serve as the committee’s ranking Republican in the next congressional session, remain an open question. He’s replacing Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) in that role, and Toomey has been one of the industry’s most reliable defenders on Capitol Hill.

Toomey, who is retiring from the Senate in the next couple of weeks, said the actions inside FTX seem to have been illegal and Bankman-Fried’s arrest in The Bahamas was no surprise to anybody, “with the possible exception of Mr. Bankman-Fried.” But he argued against blaming digital assets.

“There’s nothing intrinsically good or evil about software,” he said. “FTX and cryptocurrencies are not the same thing.”

Yorumlar

Henüz yorum yapılmamış. İlk yorumu yukarıdaki form aracılığıyla siz yapabilirsiniz.